Harnessing the Power of Heterogeneous Precision: A Comprehensive Guide to NVIDIA Tensor Core Programming and Optimization

Posted on by uplatzblog

I. Foundational Concepts: The Symbiosis of Specialized Hardware and Numerical Precision

The trajectory of modern artificial intelligence (AI) is inextricably linked to the evolution of parallel computing hardware. While traditional Central Processing Units (CPUs) excel at complex, serial tasks, their architecture is ill-suited for the massively parallel computations inherent in deep learning. Graphics Processing Units (GPUs), with their thousands of general-purpose Compute Unified Device Architecture (CUDA) cores, represented the first major paradigm shift, enabling the concurrent execution of thousands of simple operations and dramatically accelerating early deep learning models.1 Each CUDA core, capable of executing a single floating-point operation per clock cycle, transformed the landscape of what was computationally feasible. However, as neural networks grew in size and complexity, it became evident that even this level of parallelism was insufficient. The core computational pattern in deep learning—the matrix-multiply-accumulate (MMA) operation, also known as General Matrix Multiplication (GEMM)—demanded a more specialized solution.

 

The Architectural Imperative for Tensor Cores: Beyond CUDA Cores

 

The relentless growth of neural networks exposed the limitations of using general-purpose CUDA cores for the highly specific and repetitive task of matrix multiplication. This bottleneck prompted an architectural innovation: the creation of specialized hardware units designed exclusively to accelerate MMA operations. First introduced in NVIDIA’s Volta architecture, Tensor Cores are purpose-built processing units that function as small, highly efficient matrix processors integrated directly into the GPU’s Streaming Multiprocessors (SMs).1

Unlike a CUDA core, which performs a single operation at a time, a first-generation Tensor Core can execute a complete 4×4 matrix multiplication and accumulation in a single clock cycle, delivering a theoretical performance increase of an order of magnitude for deep learning workloads.2 This specialization represents a fundamental shift from general-purpose parallelism to application-specific hardware acceleration, acknowledging that the MMA operation is the computational heart of AI.

 

Principles of Mixed-Precision Arithmetic: Trading Precision for Performance

 

The immense performance of Tensor Cores is unlocked through the strategic use of mixed-precision arithmetic. This technique involves using a combination of lower-precision 16-bit floating-point formats (half precision) for the bulk of the computations and higher-precision 32-bit formats (single precision) for specific operations where numerical stability is critical.5

The primary benefits of this approach are twofold:

  1. Reduced Memory Footprint: Using 16-bit floating-point numbers (FP16) instead of 32-bit (FP32) halves the memory required for storing model weights, activations, and gradients. This reduction allows for the training of significantly larger models or the use of larger batch sizes, both of which can lead to improved accuracy.5
  2. Increased Computational Throughput: Modern NVIDIA GPUs are architected to perform 16-bit operations at a much higher rate than 32-bit operations. Tensor Cores, in particular, are designed to process these lower-precision inputs, yielding substantial speedups in training and inference time.7

However, this performance gain comes with a critical trade-off: a reduction in numerical precision. The limited range of 16-bit formats can lead to numerical instability, requiring sophisticated techniques to maintain the accuracy of the model, a central theme explored later in this report.5

 

Overview of Floating-Point Formats

 

A deep understanding of numerical formats is essential for effective mixed-precision programming. A floating-point number’s properties are defined by the allocation of its bits among a sign, an exponent (which determines the dynamic range of representable values), and a mantissa (which determines the precision). The evolution of these formats is a direct response to the evolving demands of AI models.

  • FP32 (Single Precision): The traditional baseline for scientific computing and deep learning. It uses 1 sign bit, 8 exponent bits, and 23 mantissa bits. Its wide dynamic range (1.18×10−38 to 3.4×1038) and high precision make it numerically stable but computationally and memory-intensive.9
  • FP16 (Half Precision): The first low-precision format widely adopted for AI acceleration. It uses 1 sign bit, 5 exponent bits, and 10 mantissa bits. While it offers significant speed and memory advantages, its narrow dynamic range (6.1×10−5 to 65,504) makes it highly susceptible to numerical underflow and overflow, where values become too small or too large to be represented.8
  • BF16 (BFloat16): A 16-bit format that prioritizes dynamic range over precision. It uses 1 sign bit, 8 exponent bits (same as FP32), and 7 mantissa bits. By preserving the FP32 dynamic range, it is far more resistant to overflow and underflow than FP16, making it a more stable choice for training, albeit with lower precision.9
  • TF32 (TensorFloat-32): An innovative format introduced in the NVIDIA Ampere architecture. It uses 19 bits (1 sign, 8 exponent, 10 mantissa), providing the dynamic range of FP32 and the precision of FP16. Crucially, it is treated as an FP32 number by the software, allowing existing FP32 code to leverage Tensor Cores for an automatic performance boost without code changes.11
  • Sub-8-Bit Formats (FP8, FP6, FP4): The latest formats, introduced in the Hopper and Blackwell architectures, are designed for maximum inference throughput. FP8, for example, comes in two variants: E4M3 (4 exponent, 3 mantissa) for a better balance and E5M2 (5 exponent, 2 mantissa) for a wider dynamic range.13 The newer FP4 and FP6 formats push this even further, offering dramatic performance gains for inference at the cost of significantly reduced precision.10

The progression of these data types is not accidental but a direct architectural response to the evolving landscape of AI models. As early deep learning models grew, memory and training time became critical bottlenecks, which FP16 and the first Tensor Cores in the Volta architecture were designed to solve.8 However, the numerical stability problems of FP16, particularly gradient underflow, became a major hurdle. The BF16 format emerged as a solution to this stability problem by preserving the FP32 dynamic range. NVIDIA’s TF32 format, introduced with Ampere, offered a pragmatic path for enterprise adoption by providing a “free” performance uplift for existing FP32 workflows.11 Most recently, the meteoric rise of massive Transformer models, whose sheer size makes inference deployment a challenge, directly spurred the development of FP8, FP4, and FP6 formats, which are tailored to maximize the throughput of these specific architectures.10

Format Total Bits Sign Bits Exponent Bits Mantissa Bits Key Characteristics
FP32 32 1 8 23 Baseline precision; wide dynamic range.
TF32 19 1 8 10 FP32 range, FP16 precision; drop-in replacement for FP32.
BF16 16 1 8 7 FP32 range, lower precision than FP16; resilient to underflow/overflow.
FP16 16 1 5 10 High precision for 16-bit; narrow dynamic range, prone to underflow/overflow.
FP8 (E4M3) 8 1 4 3 Balanced range and precision for inference.
FP8 (E5M2) 8 1 5 2 Wider range, lower precision for inference.
FP6 (MXFP6) 6 1 3 2 Microscaling format for extreme inference efficiency.
FP4 (MXFP4) 4 1 2 1 Microscaling format for extreme inference efficiency.
INT8 8 1 – 7 Integer format for quantized inference; no dynamic range issues but requires calibration.

 

II. Architectural Evolution of NVIDIA Tensor Cores: A Generational Deep Dive

 

The architecture of Tensor Cores has undergone a rapid and profound evolution, with each generation introducing new capabilities and precisions tailored to the advancing demands of AI and High-Performance Computing (HPC).

 

First Generation (Volta): The Dawn of Dedicated AI Hardware

 

The Volta architecture, embodied by the Tesla V100 GPU, marked the debut of Tensor Cores.1 Each of the 80 Streaming Multiprocessors (SMs) in a V100 contained eight first-generation Tensor Cores.15 These units were engineered to perform a

4×4 matrix multiply-accumulate operation (D=A×B+C) per clock cycle. The input matrices, A and B, were required to be in FP16 format, while the accumulation matrix, C, could be either FP16 or FP32. The ability to accumulate results in full FP32 precision proved to be a critical feature for maintaining model accuracy during training, mitigating the precision loss from the FP16 multiplications.3

 

Second Generation (Turing): Expanding Capabilities for Inference

 

The Turing architecture, which powered the GeForce RTX 20 series and Quadro RTX GPUs, brought Tensor Cores to a broader market and expanded their functionality beyond training.17 The key enhancement of these second-generation cores was the addition of support for lower-precision integer data types: INT8 and INT4.19 This was a strategic move to accelerate AI inference workloads, which often can be quantized to integer formats with minimal loss of accuracy. This expansion solidified the role of Tensor Cores as a versatile accelerator for the entire AI workflow, from initial training to final deployment.

 

Third Generation (Ampere): Redefining Flexibility and Efficiency

 

The Ampere architecture, featured in the A100 GPU, represented a monumental leap in Tensor Core capabilities.11 This generation introduced several groundbreaking features:

  • New Precisions: Ampere added native support for the TF32 and BF16 formats. TF32 provided an immediate performance boost for existing FP32 code, while BF16 offered a more numerically stable 16-bit alternative to FP16 for training.11
  • FP64 for HPC: For the first time, Tensor Cores could accelerate standard double-precision (FP64) matrix operations, significantly boosting performance for traditional HPC applications and blurring the lines between AI and scientific computing accelerators.11
  • Structural Sparsity: This hardware feature was designed to exploit the redundancy in neural networks by skipping computations involving zero-valued weights. By enforcing a 2-out-of-4 sparsity pattern, the hardware could theoretically double the computational throughput.11 While powerful in principle, achieving this speedup in practice proved challenging due to difficulties in maintaining model accuracy and the need for specialized kernels, leading to limited adoption compared to other optimization techniques.2
  • Multi-Instance GPU (MIG): A hardware virtualization technology that allows a single A100 GPU to be partitioned into up to seven independent, fully isolated GPU instances. This enables fine-grained resource allocation, dramatically improving utilization and quality of service for multiple simultaneous inference workloads.11

 

Fourth Generation (Hopper): Specialization for the Transformer Era

 

The Hopper architecture and its H100 GPU were engineered as a direct response to the computational demands of the massive Transformer models that came to dominate AI.22 Key innovations included:

  • FP8 Support: Hopper introduced 8-bit floating-point (FP8) precision, providing a new sweet spot between the performance of integer formats and the flexibility of floating-point formats. This was critical for reducing the memory footprint and increasing the throughput of large language models (LLMs).10
  • Transformer Engine: A pivotal hardware and software co-designed system that automates mixed-precision training and inference. The Transformer Engine dynamically analyzes the statistics of each layer in a neural network and intelligently selects the optimal precision (FP8 or FP16) on-the-fly. This abstracts away the complex task of per-layer precision tuning from the developer, maximizing performance while preserving accuracy automatically.10
  • DPX Instructions: A new set of instructions designed to accelerate dynamic programming algorithms, such as Smith-Waterman, indicating a strategic expansion of Tensor Core capabilities to a broader range of HPC workloads.13

 

Fifth Generation (Blackwell): Pushing the Frontiers of Low-Precision and Scalability

 

The latest Blackwell architecture, powering the B200 and GB200 systems, continues the trend of specialization and addresses fundamental physical limits of chip design.14

  • New Microscaling Formats: Blackwell introduces support for even lower-precision floating-point formats, including FP6 and FP4. These formats are designed to deliver extreme performance and efficiency for inference workloads, particularly for the largest generative AI models.10
  • Second-Generation Transformer Engine: An enhanced version of the Transformer Engine that incorporates support for these new microscaling formats, further refining the automated management of precision and performance.14
  • Architectural Shift for Memory Access: Blackwell makes a direct assault on the “memory wall”—the growing gap between compute speed and memory bandwidth. It introduces a specialized on-chip memory path for Tensor Cores, reducing contention on the main register file and L1 cache. This ensures the powerful compute units are not left idle waiting for data, a critical optimization for efficiency at scale.2
  • Multi-Chip Module Design: As single GPU dies approach the physical reticle limit of semiconductor manufacturing, Blackwell introduces the NV-High Bandwidth Interface (NV-HBI). This 10 TB/s interconnect links two GB100 dies together in a single package, allowing them to function as one massive, coherent GPU. This multi-chip module (MCM) approach is a direct architectural answer to the end of traditional single-die scaling.14

The evolution from Volta to Blackwell reveals a clear trend: the GPU is transforming from a homogeneous array of general-purpose cores into a complex, heterogeneous System-on-a-Chip (SoC). The initial addition of Tensor Cores in Volta was followed by RT Cores for ray tracing in Turing, the software-hardware co-designed Transformer Engine in Hopper, and specialized memory subsystems in Blackwell.2 This increasing specialization demonstrates that future performance gains will be driven not by raw clock speed increases, but by tailoring hardware to specific, dominant computational patterns and relentlessly optimizing data movement within the chip.

Architecture GPU Example Process Node Key New Precisions Key Architectural Innovation
Volta Tesla V100 12nm FP16 First-generation Tensor Core, FP32 accumulation
Turing Tesla T4 12nm INT8, INT4 Expanded inference capabilities, RT Cores
Ampere A100 7nm TF32, BF16, FP64 Structural Sparsity, Multi-Instance GPU (MIG)
Hopper H100 4nm FP8 Transformer Engine, DPX Instructions
Blackwell B200 4NP FP4, FP6 2nd-gen Transformer Engine, NV-HBI, Specialized Memory

 

III. The Mechanics of Mixed-Precision Training and Inference

 

Successfully leveraging mixed precision requires more than just casting data types; it demands specific techniques to overcome the numerical challenges posed by lower-precision formats while preserving the accuracy of the final model. The core methodology involves three key components: selective precision casting, dynamic loss scaling, and the use of a high-precision master copy of the model’s weights.

 

The Full Training Loop in Mixed Precision

 

A typical training iteration using mixed precision follows a carefully orchestrated sequence of operations:

  1. Weight Casting: A master copy of the model’s weights is maintained in FP32. At the start of the iteration, these weights are cast down to a lower-precision format like FP16 or BF16.8
  2. Forward Pass: The forward propagation, which consists primarily of Tensor Core-accelerated operations like convolutions and matrix multiplications, is performed using the 16-bit weights and activations. This step provides the primary performance benefit. However, operations known to be numerically sensitive, such as reductions (e.g., softmax), are often kept in FP32 to prevent accuracy loss.8
  3. Loss Calculation: The output of the model is compared to the ground truth labels, and the loss is calculated. This calculation is typically performed in FP32 to maintain precision.8
  4. Loss Scaling and Backward Pass: Before backpropagation, the calculated loss is multiplied by a scaling factor, S. The backward pass then computes the gradients, which are also scaled by S, using 16-bit arithmetic.
  5. Weight Update: The computed 16-bit gradients are unscaled by dividing by S and then converted back to FP32. Finally, the optimizer uses these full-precision gradients to update the FP32 master copy of the weights.8

 

Numerical Stability Challenges: Understanding Gradient Underflow and Overflow

 

The primary obstacle in FP16 training is its limited dynamic range. Compared to FP32, the range of numbers that FP16 can represent is significantly narrower, leading to two main problems:

  • Underflow: During backpropagation, gradient values, especially for deep networks, can become extremely small. The FP16 format has a minimum representable positive value of approximately 6.1×10−5. Any value smaller than this is “flushed to zero”.8 When this happens to gradients, the corresponding weight update becomes zero, effectively halting the learning process for that part of the network.
  • Overflow: While less common for gradients, large activation values or an exploding loss can exceed the maximum representable FP16 value of 65,504. This results in the value being replaced by infinity (Inf) or Not-a-Number (NaN), which propagates through the network and irreversibly corrupts the training process.25

 

The Solution: Dynamic Loss Scaling Explained

 

Dynamic loss scaling is the crucial technique used to combat gradient underflow. The core principle is straightforward: by multiplying the loss value by a large scaling factor S before the backward pass, the chain rule of calculus ensures that all subsequent gradients are also scaled by S. This multiplication effectively “shifts” the small gradient values up into the representable range of FP16, preventing them from being flushed to zero.8

However, a static, manually chosen scaling factor is not robust. If S is too small, underflow may still occur; if it is too large, the scaled gradients might overflow. Therefore, a dynamic approach is used. The training process starts with a large initial scale factor. If the gradients overflow (detected by the presence of Inf or NaN values after the backward pass), the weight update for that step is skipped, and the scale factor S is reduced (typically halved). Conversely, if training proceeds for a set number of iterations without any overflows, the scale factor is increased (typically doubled). This allows the system to automatically find the largest possible scaling factor that avoids overflow, thereby preserving the maximum number of small gradient values and ensuring stable training.25

 

Maintaining Accuracy: The Role of FP32 Master Weights

 

The second pillar of stable mixed-precision training is the use of a master copy of the weights in FP32 format. The weight update step involves adding a small value (the scaled learning rate multiplied by the gradient) to a potentially large value (the current weight). In FP16, if the magnitude of the weight is significantly larger than the magnitude of the update, the update can be lost due to the limited precision of the FP16 mantissa. This would also stall learning. To prevent this, the fast forward and backward passes use a 16-bit copy of the weights, but the optimizer step—the actual addition of the gradient update—is always performed on the high-precision FP32 master copy of the weights.8

 

Framework-Specific Implementations

 

Modern deep learning frameworks have integrated these complex mechanics into user-friendly APIs, abstracting the details from the developer.

  • PyTorch: The torch.amp module provides two key components: the autocast context manager, which automatically casts operations to FP16 or FP32 based on safety, and the GradScaler object, which manages the entire dynamic loss scaling process.27
  • TensorFlow: The tf.keras.mixed_precision API allows users to set a global Policy (e.g., ‘mixed_float16’). When using Model.fit, loss scaling is handled automatically. For custom training loops, the LossScaleOptimizer wraps a standard optimizer to perform the necessary scaling and unscaling steps.29

 

IV. Programming Models for Tensor Core Acceleration

 

Accessing the computational power of Tensor Cores can be achieved through a hierarchy of programming abstractions, each offering a different trade-off between ease of use and granular control. This allows developers with varying needs—from data scientists to performance engineers—to leverage this specialized hardware effectively.

Abstraction Level Tool/API Primary Use Case Ease of Use Performance/Flexibility
High-Level Frameworks (PyTorch AMP, TensorFlow Mixed Precision) Rapid model development and training for data scientists. Very High High (Automatic)
Mid-Level CUDA Libraries (cuBLAS, cuDNN) Building custom applications that require high-performance linear algebra or convolution primitives. Medium High (With constraints)
Library/Template CUTLASS Developing novel, high-performance GEMM or convolution kernels with custom fusions (e.g., GEMM + activation). Low Very High
Low-Level CUDA C++ (WMMA API) / PTX Assembly (MMA) Fine-grained control over hardware for library development or advanced research. Very Low Maximum

 

A. High-Level Abstraction: Leveraging Frameworks and Libraries

 

For the vast majority of users, the most efficient way to utilize Tensor Cores is through high-level deep learning frameworks and NVIDIA’s optimized libraries.

 

Automatic Mixed Precision (AMP) in PyTorch

 

PyTorch’s torch.amp module provides a near-transparent method for enabling mixed-precision training. The framework uses two main components:

  • torch.amp.autocast: This context manager automatically selects the precision for GPU operations within its scope. It maintains internal lists of operations that are safe to run in FP16 (e.g., matrix multiplications, convolutions) and those that require FP32 for numerical stability (e.g., reductions, loss functions). This allows developers to gain performance without manually casting tensors.27
  • torch.amp.GradScaler: This object automates the dynamic loss scaling process. It scales the loss before the backward pass, checks for gradient overflows after, and unscales the gradients before the optimizer step. It also dynamically adjusts the scale factor throughout training.28

A typical PyTorch training loop with AMP looks as follows:

 

Python

 

# [28]: Example of a PyTorch AMP training loop
import torch

# scaler is created once, outside the training loop
scaler = torch.cuda.amp.GradScaler()

for epoch in epochs:
    for input, target in data:
        optimizer.zero_grad()

        # Enables autocasting for the forward pass
        with torch.cuda.amp.autocast():
            output = model(input)
            loss = loss_fn(output, target)

        # Scales loss. Calls backward() on scaled loss to create scaled gradients.
        scaler.scale(loss).backward()

        # scaler.step() first unscales the gradients of the optimizer’s assigned parameters.
        # If gradients don’t contain infs or NaNs, optimizer.step() is then called.
        # Otherwise, optimizer.step() is skipped.
        scaler.step(optimizer)

        # Updates the scale for next iteration.
        scaler.update()

 

Mixed Precision API in TensorFlow

 

TensorFlow provides a similar high-level API through tf.keras.mixed_precision. The workflow involves:

  • tf.keras.mixed_precision.set_global_policy(): A single line of code sets the policy for all subsequently defined Keras layers. For NVIDIA GPUs, this is typically ‘mixed_float16’.29
  • tf.keras.mixed_precision.LossScaleOptimizer: When using a custom training loop, this class wraps a standard Keras optimizer (e.g., tf.keras.optimizers.Adam). It automatically handles the logic for applying and dynamically adjusting the loss scale. When using the high-level Model.fit() API, this wrapping is performed implicitly.7

A custom training loop in TensorFlow with mixed precision:

 

Python

 

# [29]: Example of a TensorFlow mixed precision custom training loop
# Set the global policy
tf.keras.mixed_precision.set_global_policy(‘mixed_float16’)

#… model definition…
# Ensure the final layer/activation is float32 for stability
outputs = layers.Activation(‘softmax’, dtype=‘float32’)(x)
model = keras.Model(inputs=inputs, outputs=outputs)

# Wrap the optimizer
optimizer = keras.optimizers.Adam()
optimizer = tf.keras.mixed_precision.LossScaleOptimizer(optimizer)

@tf.function
def train_step(x, y):
    with tf.GradientTape() as tape:
        predictions = model(x)
        loss = loss_object(y, predictions)
        scaled_loss = optimizer.get_scaled_loss(loss)
    scaled_gradients = tape.gradient(scaled_loss, model.trainable_variables)
    gradients = optimizer.get_unscaled_gradients(scaled_gradients)
    optimizer.apply_gradients(zip(gradients, model.trainable_variables))

 

Accelerating with CUDA Libraries

 

For developers building applications outside of major DL frameworks, Tensor Cores can be accessed via specialized CUDA libraries:

  • cuBLAS: This library for Basic Linear Algebra Subprograms uses Tensor Cores to accelerate GEMM computations. To enable this, developers must set the math mode to CUBLAS_TENSOR_OP_MATH and ensure that the matrix dimensions (m, n, and k) are multiples of 8 for FP16 operations.35
  • cuDNN: This is the CUDA Deep Neural Network library. It leverages Tensor Cores to speed up convolutions and RNNs. Similar to cuBLAS, it requires setting a math type to CUDNN_TENSOR_OP_MATH and ensuring that dimensions, such as input and output channel counts for convolutions, are multiples of 8.35

 

B. Low-Level Control: Direct Programming with CUDA C++

 

For maximum control and flexibility, developers can program Tensor Cores directly in CUDA C++. This approach is typically reserved for library developers or researchers who need to implement novel algorithms or fuse operations in ways not supported by standard libraries.

 

The WMMA API: A Warp-Level Abstraction

 

The primary interface for direct Tensor Core programming is the Warp-level Matrix-Multiply-Accumulate (WMMA) API, exposed through the nvcuda::wmma namespace in CUDA C++.36 A key concept of WMMA is that it is a

warp-level operation. This means that all 32 threads in a CUDA warp must execute the same WMMA instruction in lockstep, collectively operating on larger matrix tiles (e.g., 16x16x16).35

The core components of a WMMA kernel are:

  1. Fragments: A wmma::fragment is a C++ template object that represents a tile of a matrix distributed across the registers of all threads in a warp. The data layout within the fragment is opaque, abstracting away the hardware details from the programmer.38
  2. Loading: The wmma::load_matrix_sync function loads a tile of a matrix from shared or global memory into a fragment.
  3. MMA Operation: The wmma::mma_sync function performs the core D=A⋅B+C computation on the fragments held in registers.
  4. Storing: The wmma::store_matrix_sync function writes the resulting fragment back to memory.

 

Introduction to PTX MMA Instructions

 

For the ultimate level of control, developers can use inline PTX (Parallel Thread Execution) assembly to directly issue mma.sync.aligned instructions.40 This bypasses the C++ WMMA API, offering more flexibility in register management and instruction scheduling. However, it comes at the cost of increased complexity, reduced portability across GPU generations, and requires a deep understanding of the GPU’s instruction set architecture.41

 

C. The CUTLASS Library: Bridging Performance and Programmability

 

CUTLASS (CUDA Templates for Linear Algebra Subroutines) is an open-source NVIDIA library of C++ templates designed to provide building blocks for creating high-performance GEMM and convolution kernels.42 It bridges the gap between the rigid, black-box approach of libraries like cuBLAS and the complexity of writing raw PTX code. CUTLASS is considered a “white-box” solution, providing highly optimized and modular components that developers can compose to build custom kernels.45

The core design principle of CUTLASS is a hierarchical decomposition of the GEMM problem that maps efficiently onto the GPU’s architecture 43:

  • Threadblock-level GEMM: The overall matrix multiplication is partitioned into tiles, with each tile computed by a single CUDA thread block.
  • Warp-level GEMM: Within a thread block, the work is further divided among warps. This is the level where WMMA or MMA instructions are issued to the Tensor Cores.
  • Thread-level operations: Individual threads within a warp collaborate to move data between global memory, shared memory, and registers.

By using C++ templates, developers can instantiate a CUTLASS kernel by specifying parameters such as data types (enabling mixed precision), memory layouts, and architectural details. This allows for the creation of highly specialized and performant kernels, such as a GEMM fused with a custom activation function, without having to write the entire complex machinery from scratch.47

 

V. Performance Optimization and Profiling Strategies

 

Achieving maximum performance from Tensor Cores requires more than just enabling mixed precision; it involves structuring computations and data layouts to align with the hardware’s operational constraints and using specialized tools to verify that the hardware is being used effectively.

 

A. Best Practices for Maximizing Tensor Core Throughput

 

To ensure that deep learning operations are accelerated by Tensor Cores, developers should adhere to a set of hardware-driven guidelines.

 

The “Multiple-of-8” Rule

 

The most fundamental requirement for activating Tensor Cores is dimension alignment. Due to the way data is fetched and processed by the hardware, the dimensions of matrices and tensors involved in the computation must be multiples of a specific value.

  • For FP16 and BF16 precision, all relevant dimensions—such as the batch size, input features, output features for linear layers, and input/output channel counts for convolutions—must be a multiple of 8.49
  • For INT8 precision, this requirement becomes stricter, demanding that dimensions be a multiple of 16.50

While newer versions of cuBLAS and cuDNN can sometimes use Tensor Cores even without perfect alignment, performance is always optimal when these conditions are met.51

 

Understanding and Avoiding Quantization Effects

 

Beyond simple alignment, peak efficiency is achieved by considering how the total workload is distributed across the GPU’s SMs. Two phenomena, collectively known as quantization effects, can lead to underutilization:

  1. Tile Quantization: Tensor Core operations are executed on fixed-size tiles of data (e.g., 16×16). If a matrix dimension is not an even multiple of the tile dimension, the hardware still processes a full tile for the remaining data, leading to wasted computation on the padded elements.49
  2. Wave Quantization: The GPU schedules thread blocks onto the available SMs in “waves.” If the total number of thread blocks for a kernel is not an even multiple of the number of SMs, the final wave will not fully occupy the GPU, leaving some SMs idle and reducing overall efficiency.49

To mitigate these effects, practitioners should, when possible, choose problem sizes (batch sizes, channel counts, etc.) that are multiples of larger powers of two, such as 64, 128, or even 256. This ensures that the workload can be divided evenly into tiles and scheduled efficiently across all SMs, minimizing wasted cycles.50

 

B. Profiling and Verification with NVIDIA Nsight Tools

 

Verifying that Tensor Cores are being used and diagnosing performance issues requires specialized profiling tools. NVIDIA’s Nsight suite provides a comprehensive solution for this.

 

System-Wide Analysis with Nsight Systems

 

NVIDIA Nsight Systems is the starting point for performance analysis. It provides a system-level view of an application’s execution, correlating activity across the CPU and GPU.52 Its timeline visualization helps answer high-level questions, such as whether the application is bottlenecked by CPU processing, data transfers (memory-bound), or GPU computation (compute-bound).53 By using NVTX (NVIDIA Tools Extension) ranges, developers can annotate their code, allowing Nsight Systems to link low-level GPU kernels back to high-level operations in their source, such as specific layers in a PyTorch or TensorFlow model.54

 

Kernel-Level Deep Dive with Nsight Compute

 

Once Nsight Systems has identified a performance-critical GPU kernel, NVIDIA Nsight Compute is used for a detailed, low-level analysis of that specific kernel’s execution.55

  • Verifying Tensor Core Usage: Nsight Compute provides direct confirmation of Tensor Core activity. The key metric to inspect is sm__inst_executed_pipe_tensor_op_hmma.sum (or similar variants depending on the architecture and precision). A non-zero value for this metric is definitive proof that the kernel executed Tensor Core instructions.55
  • Analyzing Performance Metrics: If Tensor Cores are active but performance is still suboptimal, Nsight Compute offers a wealth of metrics to diagnose the issue. These include SM occupancy (how many warps are active on an SM), memory throughput (is the kernel memory-bound?), instruction mix, and cache hit rates. This detailed data helps pinpoint the exact performance limiter within the kernel.56

A common and effective profiling workflow is to first use Nsight Systems to identify the most time-consuming parts of the application and confirm they are GPU-bound. Then, use Nsight Compute to perform a deep-dive analysis on those specific kernels to verify Tensor Core usage and optimize their microarchitectural performance.53

 

VI. Synthesis and Future Outlook

 

Recapitulation of Key Principles

 

The acceleration of artificial intelligence workloads on modern GPUs is fundamentally rooted in the interplay between specialized hardware and strategic use of numerical precision. The analysis presented in this report highlights several core principles:

  • Hardware Specialization: NVIDIA Tensor Cores are dedicated hardware units designed to perform the matrix-multiply-accumulate operations that dominate AI computations, offering a significant performance advantage over general-purpose CUDA cores.
  • Mixed-Precision as an Enabler: The key to unlocking Tensor Core performance is mixed-precision training, which uses lower-precision formats like FP16 or BF16 for the bulk of computations to increase throughput and reduce memory pressure.
  • Managing Numerical Stability: The adoption of lower precision necessitates robust techniques to maintain model accuracy. Dynamic loss scaling prevents gradient underflow by shifting small gradient values into the representable range of FP16, while maintaining a master copy of weights in FP32 prevents the loss of small updates during optimization.
  • A Hierarchy of Programming Abstractions: Developers can access Tensor Cores through a spectrum of tools, from high-level, easy-to-use framework integrations like PyTorch AMP and TensorFlow’s mixed precision API, to mid-level libraries like cuBLAS, to highly flexible but complex low-level solutions like the CUTLASS library and direct CUDA C++ programming with the WMMA API. The choice of tool depends on the required balance of productivity, performance, and customizability.

 

The Trajectory of AI Hardware

 

The architectural evolution from the Volta to the Blackwell generation reveals a clear and accelerating trend away from monolithic, general-purpose designs and towards heterogeneous, specialized Systems-on-a-Chip. This trajectory is driven by two primary forces: the specific computational demands of dominant AI workloads, such as Transformers, and the fundamental physical limitations of semiconductor manufacturing. The introduction of specialized units like the Transformer Engine, dedicated on-chip memory paths, and multi-die packaging with high-speed interconnects demonstrates that future performance gains will be achieved through intelligent architectural design and the co-design of hardware and software, rather than relying solely on Moore’s Law and increases in clock frequency.

 

Concluding Remarks

 

Mastering the principles of mixed-precision arithmetic and the programming models for Tensor Cores is no longer an optional optimization for niche applications; it has become a fundamental skill for any engineer or researcher working on large-scale AI and HPC problems. The symbiotic relationship between hardware architecture, software libraries, and even the definition of numerical formats will continue to be the primary engine of progress in high-performance computing. As AI models continue to grow in complexity and scale, the ability to effectively harness the power of heterogeneous precision will be a key determinant of success.

Works cited

  1. Tensor Cores Explained in Simple Terms – DigitalOcean, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/understanding-tensor-cores
  2. NVIDIA Tensor Cores: Architecting AI Performance from Volta to Blackwell – ListenHub, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://listenhub.ai/episode/ugc-6885e723d04c2500d01a663d/nvidia-tensor-cores-architecting-ai-performance-from-volta-to-blackwell
  3. Volta (microarchitecture) – Wikipedia, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volta_(microarchitecture)
  4. NVIDIA’s Volta, Hopper, and Ampere: What They Do and Why They Matter – Uvation, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://uvation.com/articles/nvidias-volta-hopper-and-ampere-what-they-do-and-why-they-matter
  5. What is Mixed Precision Training? – GeeksforGeeks, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/deep-learning/what-is-mixed-precision-training/
  6. What is mixed precision training in Deep Learning? | by Sujatha Mudadla | Medium, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://medium.com/@sujathamudadla1213/what-is-mixed-precision-training-in-deep-learning-9195cdbadc8d
  7. Demystifying Mixed Precision Training in TensorFlow: Faster and More Efficient Deep Learning – AI Mind, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://pub.aimind.so/demystifying-mixed-precision-training-in-tensorflow-faster-and-more-efficient-deep-learning-9c2781bf97c1
  8. Mixed-Precision Training of Deep Neural Networks | NVIDIA Technical Blog, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/mixed-precision-training-deep-neural-networks/
  9. Understanding Tensorflow Mixed Precision – Theodo Data & AI, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://data-ai.theodo.com/en/technical-blog/understanding-tensorflow-mixed-precision
  10. Evolution of NVIDIA Data Center GPUs: From Pascal to Grace Blackwell – Server Simply, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.serversimply.com/blog/evolution-of-nvidia-data-center-gpus
  11. NVIDIA Ampere Architecture, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/data-center/ampere-architecture/
  12. Ampere (microarchitecture) – Wikipedia, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ampere_(microarchitecture)
  13. NVIDIA Hopper Architecture – Qumulus Technology, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.qumulus.io/nvidia-hopper-architecture/
  14. Blackwell (microarchitecture) – Wikipedia, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackwell_(microarchitecture)
  15. NVIDIA TESLA V100 GPU ARCHITECTURE, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://images.nvidia.com/content/volta-architecture/pdf/volta-architecture-whitepaper.pdf
  16. Understanding GPU Architecture – GPU Example: Tesla V100 – Tensor Cores, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://cvw.cac.cornell.edu/gpu-architecture/gpu-example-tesla-v100/tensor_cores
  17. Turing (microarchitecture) – Wikipedia, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_(microarchitecture)
  18. What Is NVIDIA Turing Architecture | HP® Tech Takes, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.hp.com/us-en/shop/tech-takes/nvidia-turing-architecture-graphics-card
  19. NVIDIA TURING GPU ARCHITECTURE, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://images.nvidia.com/aem-dam/en-zz/Solutions/design-visualization/technologies/turing-architecture/NVIDIA-Turing-Architecture-Whitepaper.pdf
  20. NVIDIA Turing Architecture In-Depth | NVIDIA Technical Blog, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/nvidia-turing-architecture-in-depth/
  21. NVIDIA Debuts Ampere Architecture with NVIDIA A100 & DGX A100 | Exxact Blog, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.exxactcorp.com/blog/HPC/nvidia-debuts-ampere-architecture-with-nvidia-a100-dgx-a100-a-game-changer-for-ai-hpc-workloads
  22. Hopper (microarchitecture) – Wikipedia, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hopper_(microarchitecture)
  23. [2402.13499] Benchmarking and Dissecting the Nvidia Hopper GPU Architecture – arXiv, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.13499
  24. Dissecting the NVIDIA Blackwell Architecture with Microbenchmarks – arXiv, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2507.10789v2
  25. INTRODUCTION TO MIXED PRECISION TRAINING – NVlabs, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://nvlabs.github.io/iccv2019-mixed-precision-tutorial/files/dusan_stosic_intro_to_mixed_precision_training.pdf
  26. Automatic Mixed Precision (AMP) Training, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.cs.toronto.edu/ecosystem/documents/AMP-Tutorial.pdf
  27. Automatic Mixed Precision package – torch.amp — PyTorch 2.7 …, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://pytorch.org/docs/stable/amp.html
  28. Automatic Mixed Precision — PyTorch Tutorials 2.7.0+cu126 …, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://pytorch.org/tutorials/recipes/recipes/amp_recipe.html
  29. Mixed precision | TensorFlow Core, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.tensorflow.org/guide/mixed_precision
  30. pytorch/docs/source/amp.rst at main – GitHub, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/main/docs/source/amp.rst
  31. Automatic mixed precision in PyTorch using AMD GPUs — ROCm Blogs, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://rocm.blogs.amd.com/artificial-intelligence/automatic-mixed-precision/README.html
  32. What Every User Should Know About Mixed Precision Training in pytorch – Medium, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://medium.com/data-scientists-diary/what-every-user-should-know-about-mixed-precision-training-in-pytorch-63c6544e5a05
  33. Mixed precision – Keras, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://keras.io/api/mixed_precision/
  34. How to enable TensorFlow mixed precision? – Omi AI, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.omi.me/blogs/tensorflow-guides/how-to-enable-tensorflow-mixed-precision
  35. Programming Tensor Cores in CUDA 9 | NVIDIA Technical Blog, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/programming-tensor-cores-cuda-9/
  36. NVIDIA Tensor Core Programming – Lei Mao’s Log Book, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://leimao.github.io/blog/NVIDIA-Tensor-Core-Programming/
  37. Tensor Core Programming Using CUDA Fortran | NVIDIA Technical Blog, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/tensor-core-programming-using-cuda-fortran/
  38. mma.sync.aligned – arXiv, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2407.09621v1
  39. Benchmarking GPU Tensor Cores on General Matrix Multiplication Kernels through CUTLASS – Xianwei Zhang, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://xianweiz.github.io/doc/papers/cutlass_applsci23.pdf
  40. Nvidia Tensor Core-Getting Started with MMA PTX Programming …, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://bruce-lee-ly.medium.com/nvidia-tensor-core-getting-started-with-mma-ptx-programming-508e44a6cb7d
  41. WMMA vs. MMA – CUDA Programming and Performance – NVIDIA Developer Forums, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/wmma-vs-mma/318949
  42. MekkCyber/CutlassAcademy: A curated collection of resources, tutorials, and best practices for learning and mastering NVIDIA CUTLASS – GitHub, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://github.com/MekkCyber/CutlassAcademy
  43. CUTLASS: Fast Linear Algebra in CUDA C++ | NVIDIA Technical Blog, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/cutlass-linear-algebra-cuda/
  44. Welcome to CUTLASS – NVIDIA Docs Hub, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://docs.nvidia.com/cutlass/index.html
  45. CUDA C++ Programming Guide – NVIDIA Docs Hub, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/cuda-c-programming-guide/index.html#warp-matrix-functions
  46. Efficient GEMM in CUDA — NVIDIA CUTLASS Documentation, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://docs.nvidia.com/cutlass/media/docs/cpp/efficient_gemm.html
  47. Implementing High Performance Matrix Multiplication Using CUTLASS v2.8, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/implementing-high-performance-matrix-multiplication-using-cutlass-v2-8/
  48. Quickstart — NVIDIA CUTLASS Documentation, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://docs.nvidia.com/cutlass/media/docs/cpp/quickstart.html
  49. TENSOR CORE DL PERFORMANCE GUIDE – NVIDIA, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://developer.download.nvidia.com/video/gputechconf/gtc/2019/presentation/s9926-tensor-core-performance-the-ultimate-guide.pdf
  50. Tips for Optimizing GPU Performance Using Tensor Cores | NVIDIA …, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/optimizing-gpu-performance-tensor-cores/
  51. Get Started With Deep Learning Performance – NVIDIA Docs, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://docs.nvidia.com/deeplearning/performance/dl-performance-getting-started/index.html
  52. Nsight Systems – Introduction – VI-HPS, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.vi-hps.org/cms/upload/material/tw41/Nsight_Systems.pdf
  53. Profiling CUDA Using Nsight Systems: A Numba Example | by Carlos Costa, Ph.D. – Medium, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://medium.com/data-science/profiling-cuda-using-nsight-systems-a-numba-example-fc65003f8c52
  54. Nsight Systems – DL Profiling Argonne National Labs 2022-06-30, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.alcf.anl.gov/sites/default/files/2024-07/Nsight-Systems-DL-Profiling-2022-06-30.pdf
  55. Using Nsight Compute or Nvprof to Show Mixed Precision Use in …, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/using-nsight-compute-nvprof-mixed-precision-deep-learning-models/
  56. 3. Nsight Compute — NsightCompute 12.9 documentation, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://docs.nvidia.com/nsight-compute/NsightCompute/index.html