The Context Window Explosion: Architectural Imperatives for Million-Token Inference at Scale

1. The Context Horizon: From Stateless Processing to Infinite Memory

The latter half of 2025 marks a definitive inflection point in the trajectory of artificial intelligence. While the previous decade was defined by the race for parameter count—scaling from millions to trillions of weights—the current epoch is characterized by the “Context Window Explosion.” The ability to process, reason over, and retain vast amounts of information in a single forward pass has shifted from a theoretical capability to a production imperative. We are witnessing the transition of Large Language Models (LLMs) from stateless text processors, constrained by the sliding window of their immediate input, into stateful reasoning engines capable of ingesting entire codebases, legal archives, and video libraries.

1.1 The Million-Token Standard and Beyond

By late 2025, the industry standard for enterprise-grade foundation models has firmly settled at the one-million-token mark, with vanguard architectures pushing orders of magnitude beyond. This shift is not merely quantitative; it represents a fundamental change in the utility function of generative AI.

The landscape is currently dominated by a diverse array of architectures, each targeting specific modalities of long-context understanding:

• Google Gemini 2.5 Pro & Flash: These models have normalized the 1-2 million token window for general-purpose tasks. By leveraging massive Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures, Google has managed to decouple active parameter usage from total capacity, allowing for sustained reasoning over long sequences without the prohibitive compute costs associated with dense models.1
• Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4 & Opus 4: The Claude family, recently upgraded from 200,000 to 1 million tokens, has carved a niche in high-fidelity retrieval. Unlike early long-context models that suffered from the “lost-in-the-middle” phenomenon—where information in the center of a long prompt was ignored—Claude’s architecture emphasizes attention fidelity, making it the preferred choice for complex legal and financial analysis where every clause in a 500-page document matters.1
• Meta Llama 4 Scout: Perhaps the most significant development for edge and on-device applications is Llama 4 Scout. This model offers a 10 million token context window optimized for a single GPU node. Its architecture is specifically tuned for multimodal workflows, such as deep video/audio transcript analysis and full-book summarization, signaling a democratization of long-context capabilities beyond hyperscaler data centers.1
• Magic.dev LTM-2-Mini: Standing as an outlier in the current field, Magic.dev has introduced the LTM-2-Mini, creating a new ceiling with a staggering 100 million token context window. To put this in perspective, 100 million tokens is roughly equivalent to 750 novels or 10 million lines of code. This capacity allows the model to ingest entire software repositories or genomic datasets in a single prompt. While evidence of widespread production deployment remains scarce, the existence of such a model suggests a radical departure from standard Transformer attention mechanisms, likely utilizing specialized recurrent or State-Space Models (SSMs) to achieve linear scaling.1

1.2 The Obsolescence of RAG and the Rise of Many-Shot Learning

The explosion of context windows challenges the prevailing orthodoxy of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). For years, RAG has been the standard solution to the context limit: chunking documents, embedding them into vector databases, and retrieving top-k chunks based on semantic similarity. While efficient, this process is inherently lossy. It shreds global context, breaks cross-document reasoning chains, and relies on the imperfect proxy of vector similarity to determine relevance.

With 1M+ context windows, we are seeing the emergence of “Many-Shot Learning” or “Long-Context Prompting.” Instead of retrieving snippets, the system ingests the entire knowledge base—the full manual, the complete case history, the whole codebase—into the prompt. This allows the model’s native attention mechanism to perform reasoning over the raw data, identifying subtle connections and contradictions that vector search would inevitably miss.4

Furthermore, this capacity is the foundational enabler for Agentic Workflows. An autonomous agent operating over days or weeks generates a massive trail of observations, tool outputs, and internal monologues. In a 4k token world, this history had to be aggressively summarized or discarded, forcing the agent to effectively “forget” its past. With million-token windows, agents can maintain a persistent “stream of consciousness,” recalling a specific error message from three days ago to inform a current debugging decision.3

1.3 The Infrastructure Imperative

However, this capability comes at a steep physical cost. The move from 4k to 1M tokens increases the memory requirements for the Key-Value (KV) cache by factor of 250x. In a standard Transformer, this memory demand scales linearly with sequence length, while the compute required for attention scales quadratically. This creates a “Memory Wall” where the bottleneck for inference shifts decisively from compute (FLOPS) to memory capacity and bandwidth.

Sustaining these context lengths in production requires a sophisticated, hierarchical approach to memory management. We can no longer treat the GPU’s High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) as the sole repository for state. Instead, we must architect systems that treat GPU VRAM, CPU DRAM, and local NVMe SSDs as a unified, tiered address space, orchestrated by intelligent algorithms that move data just in time.

2. The Physics of the Memory Wall: Arithmetic of the KV Cache

To understand the necessity of complex memory tiering, one must first analyze the arithmetic intensity and memory footprint of the Key-Value (KV) cache in modern Transformers. In an autoregressive model, generating the next token requires the model to attend to the hidden states (Keys and Values) of all preceding tokens. Recomputing these states for the entire history at every step would be computationally prohibitive ($O(N^3)$ complexity). Therefore, these tensors are cached in GPU memory, growing with every token generated.

2.1 The KV Cache Formula

The memory footprint of the KV cache ($M_{KV}$) for a standard Transformer is governed by the following relationship:

 

$$M_{KV} = 2 \times n_{layers} \times n_{heads} \times d_{head} \times L_{seq} \times P_{bytes}$$

Where:

• $2$: Accounts for both Key and Value matrices.
• $n_{layers}$: The number of transformer layers (depth).
• $n_{heads}$: The number of attention heads per layer.
• $d_{head}$: The dimension of each attention head.
• $L_{seq}$: The sequence length (current context window).
• $P_{bytes}$: The precision of the stored tensors (e.g., 2 bytes for FP16, 1 byte for FP8).

Consider a production-grade model like Llama-3-70B. It features 80 layers ($n_{layers}$), and while it uses Grouped Query Attention (GQA) to reduce the number of KV heads, the memory footprint remains substantial. For a standard configuration without GQA reduction, a single request with a 1 million token context would generate a KV cache in the range of hundreds of gigabytes—far exceeding the 80GB capacity of an NVIDIA H100 or even the 141GB of an H200.6

Variable Cost Analysis:

It is crucial to distinguish between the Fixed Cost and the Variable Cost of inference memory.

• Fixed Cost: Model weights, CUDA kernels, and system buffers. For a 70B parameter model in FP16, this is roughly 140GB. This is static regardless of context length.
• Variable Cost: The KV cache. This grows linearly with $L_{seq}$. In the regime of massive context, the variable cost quickly dominates the fixed cost. At 100k tokens, the cache might equal the model weights. At 1M tokens, the cache is nearly 10x the size of the model weights.6

2.2 The Bandwidth Bottleneck: Prefill vs. Decode

The challenge of massive context is bifurcated into two distinct phases with opposing hardware bottlenecks: Prefill and Decode.

2.2.1 The Prefill Phase (Compute Bound)

When a user submits a 1 million token prompt, the model processes all tokens in parallel to generate the initial KV cache and the first output token. This is a massive matrix multiplication workload.

• Characteristics: High arithmetic intensity. The GPU’s Tensor Cores are fully saturated.
• Bottleneck: Compute (FLOPS).
• Architecture: Techniques like FlashAttention-3 are critical here to optimize the $O(N^2)$ attention calculation.7

2.2.2 The Decode Phase (Memory Bandwidth Bound)

Once the first token is generated, the model enters the autoregressive decode loop. To generate token $T_{N+1}$, the GPU must load the Key and Value vectors for tokens $T_1$ through $T_N$ from memory to the compute units.

• Characteristics: Extremely low arithmetic intensity. For every byte of data loaded (the massive KV cache), very few floating-point operations are performed (just the attention score calculation for the single new token).
• Bottleneck: Memory Bandwidth.
• The Problem: The HBM3e on an H200 GPU offers roughly 4.8 TB/s of bandwidth. Even with this incredible speed, loading a 100GB KV cache 100 times per second (to achieve 100 tokens/sec generation) would require 10 TB/s of bandwidth—physically impossible on a single card.

This creates the “Memory Wall.” As context length ($L_{seq}$) increases, the time to load the KV cache increases linearly, eventually exceeding the time required to compute the token. When the KV cache exceeds local VRAM capacity and spills to system RAM (DRAM) or SSD, the bandwidth drops precipitously:

• HBM3e: ~4,800 GB/s
• DDR5 DRAM: ~200-400 GB/s (depending on channels)
• PCIe Gen 5 SSD: ~14-26 GB/s 8

Moving a 100GB cache over PCIe Gen 5 (128 GB/s max theoretical) would take nearly a second per token, rendering the application unusable for real-time interaction. This necessitates the complex tiering and “hiding” strategies discussed in this report.

3. Memory Virtualization and Management: The Software Layer

To manage these massive, dynamic memory requirements, the software layer of the inference stack has undergone a revolution. The monolithic memory allocation strategies of 2023 have been replaced by sophisticated virtualization techniques borrowed from operating system theory.

3.1 vLLM and PagedAttention: The Foundation

The foundational technology enabling modern long-context inference is PagedAttention, popularized by the vLLM engine. Before PagedAttention, inference engines required contiguous memory allocation for the Key and Value tensors. If a user requested a 1M token window, the system had to pre-allocate a contiguous block of VRAM sufficient for 1M tokens.

This led to two forms of waste:

1. Internal Fragmentation: If the user only used 100k tokens of the reserved 1M, 90% of the memory was wasted “reserved” space.
2. External Fragmentation: As requests of varying lengths started and finished, holes opened up in memory. A new request might need 10GB of contiguous space, and while the GPU might have 10GB free in total, it might be split into two 5GB chunks, preventing allocation.

The Paging Solution:

PagedAttention divides the KV cache into fixed-size blocks (pages), typically containing the keys and values for 16 or 32 tokens. These blocks do not need to be contiguous in physical memory. A Block Manager (analogous to an OS Page Table) maintains the mapping between logical token indices and physical block addresses.9

• Dynamic Allocation: Blocks are allocated on-demand. As a sequence grows, the Block Manager simply claims the next available physical block from the pool.
• Fragmentation Elimination: External fragmentation is eliminated entirely. Internal fragmentation is restricted to the last partial block of a sequence (e.g., if a block holds 16 tokens and the sequence ends at token 17, only 15 slots in the second block are wasted). This results in near-zero memory waste.11

3.2 Jenga: Heterogeneous Memory Allocation

While PagedAttention solved the basic fragmentation problem, the diversity of model architectures in 2025—specifically the rise of Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) and models with varying embedding sizes—introduced new complexities. A fixed block size that is optimal for one layer or expert might be suboptimal for another.

Jenga, a memory allocation framework introduced in 2025 and implemented on top of vLLM, addresses this heterogeneity.12

• The Heterogeneity Challenge: Modern LLMs often exhibit varying token dependencies and embedding dimensions across layers. A standard page size might align perfectly with the embedding dimension of the attention heads in Layer 1 but cause misalignment or padding waste in Layer 40.
• The LCM Allocator: Jenga employs a two-level memory allocator. At the core is the LCM Allocator, which calculates the Least Common Multiple (LCM) of the embedding sizes across all layers of the model. It uses this LCM to determine a physical page size that is mathematically compatible with all layers, ensuring that blocks can be densely packed without padding.12
• Head vs. Tail Management: Jenga also distinguishes between “head” tokens (stable, older context) and “tail” tokens (recent, actively changing context). It applies different eviction and caching policies to these groups, recognizing that tail tokens are more likely to be accessed or modified.
• Impact: By tailoring the allocation strategy to the specific structural properties of the model, Jenga improves GPU memory utilization by up to 79.6% and increases serving throughput by nearly 5x in heterogeneous workloads compared to standard PagedAttention.13

3.3 Handling Out-Of-Memory (OOM) in Production

Despite these optimizations, a 100M token request will eventually exhaust VRAM. Production systems in late 2025 utilize sophisticated swapping mechanisms managed by the Block Manager.

• Swapping to DRAM: When the free block pool in VRAM is exhausted, the scheduler identifies “victim” sequences—typically those currently waiting in the queue or those with lower priority. Their blocks are evicted to CPU DRAM.
• Swapping to SSD: If DRAM is also full, blocks are demoted to local NVMe SSDs.
• The Prefill/Decode Tradeoff: Swapping is generally not performed for active decoding of a single high-priority stream due to the latency penalty. Instead, it is used to manage concurrency. While User A is reading a response (think time), their context is swapped out to SSD. When they reply, the system must swap it back in. The speed of this “warm start” is entirely dependent on the bandwidth of the storage hierarchy, discussed in the next chapter.15

4. The Hardware Hierarchy: Tiering for Infinite Context

The software virtualization described above relies on a robust physical substrate. The memory hierarchy for AI inference has formalized into three distinct tiers, each with specific bandwidth and capacity characteristics.

4.1 Tier 1: High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)

This is the “Hot” tier where active computation occurs.

• Hardware: NVIDIA H100 (80GB HBM3), H200 (141GB HBM3e), and the new Blackwell B200 (192GB HBM3e).
• Bandwidth: ~4.8 TB/s to 8 TB/s.
• Role: Stores the active “working set” of the KV cache—the blocks currently being attended to for the immediate token generation.
• Constraint: Capacity. Even 192GB is insufficient for a batch of concurrent million-token requests.

4.2 Tier 2: Host Memory (DRAM)

This is the “Warm” tier.

• Hardware: Server-grade DDR5 RAM. Production nodes now routinely carry 1TB to 2TB of DRAM.
• Bandwidth: ~400 GB/s (assuming 8-channel DDR5-4800 or higher).
• Role: Acts as a fast swap space. The bandwidth gap between HBM (8 TB/s) and DRAM (400 GB/s) is a factor of 20x. While too slow for real-time attention over the full context, it is fast enough to stream blocks in using pipelining—overlapping the transfer of the next block with the computation of the current one.6

4.3 Tier 3: Local Storage (NVMe SSD)

This is the “Cold” tier, but in 2025 it has become an “Active” tier thanks to interface advancements.

• Hardware: PCIe Gen 5 and emerging Gen 6 NVMe SSDs (e.g., Micron 9650, ScaleFlux CSD5000).
• Bandwidth: ~14 GB/s (Gen 5) to ~26 GB/s (Gen 6) per drive. RAID 0 configurations with 4-8 drives can push this towards 100 GB/s.8
• Role: Stores the full context of suspended sessions and massive “long-tail” archival data that is only sparsely accessed.
• Innovation: The move to PCIe Gen 6 is critical here. With 128 GB/s (x16 unidirectional) bandwidth, the link between the host CPU and the SSD array is no longer a trivial bottleneck. A 100GB context can be loaded in roughly 4 seconds, allowing for acceptable interactive latency for resuming paused sessions.17

4.4 The Interconnect Glue: CXL and NVLink

Binding these tiers together are the interconnects.

• NVLink 5: The Blackwell generation introduces NVLink 5, offering 1.8 TB/s of bidirectional bandwidth per GPU. This is the lifeblood of multi-GPU inference (discussed in Chapter 7), allowing the HBM of all GPUs in a node to act as a single pooled memory space.19
• CXL (Compute Express Link): While still maturing, CXL 3.0/3.1 is beginning to appear in late 2025 roadmaps (e.g., Samsung’s plans). CXL allows the GPU to access host DRAM or even CXL-attached memory expanders with cache coherency and lower latency than standard PCIe, effectively blurring the line between Tier 1 and Tier 2.21

5. Algorithmic Compression: Quantization and Eviction

While hardware tiering expands capacity, algorithmic compression increases the density of information, allowing more tokens to fit into the fast Tier 1 HBM. In 2025, we have moved beyond simple uniform quantization to sophisticated, structure-aware compression.

5.1 KIVI: Asymmetric 2-bit Quantization

Standard INT8 or INT4 quantization often fails for the KV cache in long-context scenarios because the attention mechanism is highly sensitive to outliers. KIVI, a tuning-free asymmetric quantization technique, addresses this by exploiting the different statistical properties of Keys and Values.23

• Per-Channel Keys: Research analyzed in the KIVI papers reveals that the Key matrices exhibit outliers that are concentrated in specific channels (feature dimensions). These outlier channels persist across tokens. KIVI applies per-channel quantization to Keys, allocating higher precision (or different scaling factors) to these specific outlier channels while aggressively compressing the rest.
• Per-Token Values: Conversely, the Value matrices do not show channel-wise outliers but vary significantly in magnitude from token to token. KIVI applies per-token quantization to Values.
• Result: By decoupling the quantization strategy for K and V, KIVI achieves an average precision of 2 bits per element with negligible degradation in perplexity or retrieval accuracy. This effectively quadruples the context capacity of HBM compared to standard FP16 storage.25

5.2 MiniKV: Layer-Discriminative Quantization

While KIVI optimizes the tensor representation, MiniKV optimizes across the depth of the model.27

• Layer Sensitivity: MiniKV relies on the observation that not all transformer layers are equally critical for long-context retrieval. Lower layers often process local syntax, while deeper layers handle semantic integration.
• Discriminative Strategy: MiniKV profiles the sensitivity of each layer to quantization noise. It then assigns variable bitwidths: sensitive “heavy hitter” layers might be kept at INT4 or INT8, while robust layers are pushed to INT2.
• System Co-Design: Crucially, MiniKV is not just a theoretical algorithm; it includes specialized CUDA kernels that can perform attention computations directly on these mixed-precision formats without dequantizing the entire block to FP16 first. This reduces the memory bandwidth consumption during the compute phase itself, boosting throughput by up to 48% on A100/H100 hardware.27

5.3 SnapKV and Eviction Policies

The most aggressive form of compression is eviction: simply not storing tokens that don’t matter. SnapKV automates this by exploiting the sparsity of attention patterns.30

• The Heavy Hitter Hypothesis: In any given long context, the model will typically attend heavily to a small subset of tokens (the “heavy hitters”)—often the instruction prompt, specific relevant retrieval chunks, and recent history. The vast majority of tokens receive near-zero attention.
• Snapshotting: SnapKV monitors attention weights during the prefill phase. It identifies these clusters of importance and constructs a compressed “snapshot” of the KV cache that retains only these critical tokens.
• Tiering Integration: In a tiered system, SnapKV keeps the “snapshot” in Tier 1 (HBM) for ultra-fast decoding. The full, losslessly preserved context is evicted to Tier 2 or Tier 3. If the model’s attention mechanism (perhaps utilizing a “sentry” token) indicates a need to access the evicted context, it can be paged back in, though SnapKV primarily aims to serve inference entirely from the compressed snapshot.30

6. Computational Storage and Near-Data Processing

As we push the boundaries of offloading to Tier 3 (SSD), the PCIe bus—even at Gen 6 speeds—remains a bottleneck compared to internal SSD bandwidth. This has sparked a renaissance in Computational Storage Drives (CSDs), where compute is moved to the data.

6.1 InstInfer: In-Storage Attention Offloading

InstInfer is a groundbreaking architecture that fundamentally changes the data flow of inference. Instead of moving the KV cache from SSD to GPU to compute attention, InstInfer moves the attention kernel to the SSD.16

• The InstCSD: The system utilizes specialized CSDs equipped with embedded accelerators (FPGA or ARM cores).
• The Workflow:

1. InstGPU: The main GPU computes the Query vector for the current token.
2. Offload: Instead of requesting the KV cache, the GPU sends the Query vector to the CSD.
3. In-Storage Compute: The CSD reads the KV cache from its internal NAND flash (which has massive internal bandwidth, often higher than the external PCIe link) and computes the attention scores and the weighted sum locally.
4. Result Return: The CSD returns only the final attention output vector to the GPU.

• Bandwidth Savings: This reduces the data transfer over PCIe from gigabytes (the full cache) to kilobytes (the query and result vectors).
• SparF Attention: To make this feasible on the lower-power processors inside an SSD, InstInfer uses SparF (Sparse Flash Attention). This algorithm uses a two-step retrieval process: first identifying relevant pages using a lightweight index (stored in CSD DRAM), and then performing token-level computation only on those pages. This optimization allows the CSD to keep up with the GPU’s decoding speed.33
• Impact: InstInfer has demonstrated 11x higher throughput for long-sequence inference compared to standard SSD offloading strategies.16

6.2 ScaleFlux: Transparent Compression Offloading

While InstInfer focuses on the compute kernel, ScaleFlux targets the storage density and effective bandwidth through transparent hardware compression.35

• The CSD5000 Series: These drives feature a dedicated compression/decompression engine in the controller silicon.
• KV Cache Compressibility: KV caches are often highly redundant (sparse). ScaleFlux drives compress this data on the fly as it is written to NAND and decompress it as it is read.
• Bandwidth Multiplier: Crucially, this compression effectively multiplies the read bandwidth. If the data achieves a 2:1 compression ratio, the host sees 2x the effective throughput because it receives 2GB of uncompressed data for every 1GB of physical data read from the flash.
• Latency Consistency: By offloading compression from the host CPU, ScaleFlux drives eliminate the latency spikes (“jitter”) associated with software compression, providing the predictable access times required for real-time inference serving.36

Table 1: Comparison of Advanced Offloading Technologies

Feature	Standard NVMe Offload	InstInfer (In-Storage Compute)	ScaleFlux (Transparent Compression)
Data Movement	Full KV Cache (GBs) over PCIe	Query/Result vectors (KBs) only	Full KV Cache (Compressed)
Bottleneck	PCIe Bandwidth	CSD Compute Power	PCIe Bandwidth (improved by ratio)
Compute Location	Main GPU	SSD Controller / FPGA	Main GPU
Key Algorithm	Software Swap (OS/vLLM)	SparF (Sparse Flash Attention)	Hardware LZ/GZIP variant
Best Use Case	Cold Storage / Paused Sessions	Active Decoding of Massive Context	Maximizing Capacity & Eff. Bandwidth

7. Distributed Inference: Scaling Out to the Cluster

When a 10M or 100M token context simply cannot physically fit on a single node—even with tiering—we must scale out. Distributed inference strategies in 2025 have evolved to handle the specific dependencies of the attention mechanism.

7.1 Ring Attention: Blockwise Parallelism

Ring Attention is the architectural breakthrough that enables “near-infinite” context scaling. It allows the context window to scale linearly with the number of devices, rather than being limited by the memory of a single device.38

• Blockwise Decomposition: Standard attention requires multiplying $Q \times K^T$. Ring Attention breaks $Q$, $K$, and $V$ into blocks distributed across $N$ GPUs.
• The Ring Topology:

1. Each GPU holds a block of $Q$ and a block of $K, V$.
2. Step 1: GPU $i$ computes local attention: $Attention(Q_i, K_i, V_i)$.
3. Step 2 (The Rotate): Simultaneously, GPU $i$ sends its $K_i, V_i$ block to neighbor $i+1$ and receives block $K_{i-1}, V_{i-1}$ from neighbor $i-1$.
4. Step 3: GPU $i$ computes attention with the new block.
5. This repeats $N$ times until every $Q$ block has attended to every $K, V$ block.

• Communication Overlap: The magic of Ring Attention is overlap. The transmission of the blocks (Step 2) happens concurrently with the computation (Step 1/3). If the time to compute a block is greater than the time to transmit it (which is true for large block sizes and high-bandwidth interconnects like NVLink), the communication overhead is effectively zero. This allows the cluster to behave as a single, massive GPU.39

7.2 Context Parallelism (CP) and DeepSpeed Ulysses

Context Parallelism (CP) is the production implementation of sequence splitting used in frameworks like Megatron-Core.42

• Pass-KV vs. Pass-Q: CP implementations can choose to circulate the KV blocks (Pass-KV, similar to Ring Attention) or circulate the Query blocks (Pass-Q). The choice depends on the specific dimensions of the model and the bandwidth/latency characteristics of the interconnect.
• DeepSpeed Ulysses: This variant partitions the input sequence across GPUs but uses an all-to-all collective communication to redistribute the attention heads. Each GPU computes attention for the entire sequence but only for a specific subset of heads. This is highly efficient for models with many attention heads but requires high bisection bandwidth.44

7.3 PrisKV: RDMA-Based Disaggregated Memory

For clusters that need flexible, elastic memory management rather than rigid parallel training, PrisKV offers a solution based on Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA).45

• Disaggregation: PrisKV decouples memory from compute. It treats the DRAM of all nodes in a cluster as a shared pool.
• Zero-Copy GDR: PrisKV utilizes GPU Direct RDMA. When a GPU needs to swap out a KV block, it sends it directly from HBM to the NIC, and then over the network to a remote node’s RAM. The CPU of the host node is never involved (Zero-Copy), drastically reducing latency and CPU overhead.
• Context Migration: This architecture enables seamless context migration. If a request is rescheduled from Node A to Node B (e.g., for load balancing), Node B can simply fetch the context from Node A’s memory via RDMA, without the context ever needing to be recomputed or passed through a central storage server.45

8. Case Study: Fireworks AI “FireAttention”

A prime example of these technologies coalescing into a production system is Fireworks AI, which has deployed a proprietary serving engine known as FireAttention.46

• The Challenge: Serving models like Mixtral and Llama 3 with long contexts on H100 hardware requires maximizing the utilization of the new Transformer Engine features.
• Multi-Host Sharding: FireAttention V2 implements a custom sharding strategy that goes beyond standard Tensor Parallelism. It distributes the KV cache across multiple hosts to support contexts that exceed single-node HBM capacity, utilizing the cluster’s aggregate bandwidth.
• FP8 and Hardware Kernels: Fireworks aggressively utilizes FP8 precision for the KV cache. While FP8 reduces memory footprint by 50% vs FP16, it typically introduces accuracy concerns. FireAttention mitigates this with custom CUDA kernels tuned for the Hopper architecture’s specific numerical behavior.
• Performance: By combining FP8 cache with optimized MQA (Multi-Query Attention) kernels, FireAttention achieves a 4x latency reduction and 8x throughput improvement compared to baseline vLLM implementations on the same hardware. This validates the thesis that aggressive, hardware-aware quantization is the most effective lever for performance in the memory-bound regime.47

9. The Hardware Roadmap: 2026 and Beyond

The strategies outlined in this report are heavily influenced by the imminent hardware roadmap.

• NVIDIA Blackwell (GB200/NVL72): The Blackwell architecture is designed specifically for this trillion-parameter, million-token era. The NVL72 rack connects 72 GPUs via NVLink 5 into a single domain with 130 TB/s of aggregate bandwidth. This essentially creates a single “SuperGPU” with ~13TB of HBM, capable of fitting a 10M+ token context entirely in Tier 1 memory for a single model.19
• Decompression Engines: Blackwell GPUs include dedicated hardware decompression engines. This allows compressed data to be fetched from memory/storage and decompressed at wire speed (800 GB/s), enabling the kind of transparent compression ScaleFlux performs at the SSD level to happen at the GPU memory level.20
• PCIe Gen 6 Ecosystem: With Intel and AMD host CPUs supporting PCIe Gen 6 in late 2025/2026, and SSDs like the Micron 9650 hitting the market, the bandwidth gap between the host and the GPU will narrow significantly. This will make “Tier 3” (SSD) offloading indistinguishable from “Tier 2” (DRAM) offloading for many workloads, further driving down the cost of long-context inference.49

10. Conclusion: The Converged Architecture

The “Context Window Explosion” has fundamentally altered the architecture of AI inference. The view of an LLM as a static model file loaded into a single GPU is obsolete. The production architecture for million-token inference in 2026 is a hybrid, hierarchical distributed system.

It requires the convergence of:

1. Operating System Principles: Virtual memory, paging, and fragmentation management (vLLM/Jenga).
2. Storage Systems: In-storage compute and transparent compression (InstInfer/ScaleFlux).
3. Distributed Computing: RDMA pooling and Ring-based parallelism (PrisKV/Ring Attention).
4. Algorithmic Innovation: Asymmetric quantization and sparsity (KIVI/SnapKV).

For the systems architect, the challenge is no longer just “fitting the model.” It is orchestrating this complex dance of data movement, ensuring that the critical “heavy hitter” tokens reside in HBM, the warm context waits in DRAM, and the archival history rests in computational storage, all while the GPU computes attention at the speed of light. The million-token window is not just a feature; it is a new computing paradigm.

Table 2: Summary of Key Technologies for Long-Context Inference

Technology	Category	Primary Function	Key Benefit
vLLM / PagedAttention	Memory Management	Virtualization of KV Cache	Eliminates fragmentation, enables flexible paging.
Jenga	Memory Allocation	Heterogeneous Block Sizing	Optimizes memory for MoE/varying embeddings.
KIVI	Compression	Asymmetric 2-bit Quantization	4x capacity increase with near-lossless retrieval.
SnapKV	Eviction	Heavy-Hitter Retention	massive reduction in cache size by dropping irrelevant tokens.
InstInfer	Hardware/Storage	In-Storage Attention Compute	Bypasses PCIe bottleneck for massive offloaded contexts.
Ring Attention	Parallelism	Blockwise Ring Communication	Linear context scaling across multiple GPUs.
PrisKV	Distributed Systems	RDMA-based Memory Pooling	Zero-copy context migration and disaggregation.

Works cited

1. LLMs with largest context windows – Codingscape, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://codingscape.com/blog/llms-with-largest-context-windows
2. Best 44 Large Language Models (LLMs) in 2025 – Exploding Topics, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://explodingtopics.com/blog/list-of-llms
3. Top 9 Large Language Models as of December 2025 | Shakudo, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.shakudo.io/blog/top-9-large-language-models
4. The 1 Million Token Context Window: A Game Changer or a Computational Challenge? | by Prashant Sahdev | Medium, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://medium.com/@prashantsahdev/the-1-million-token-context-window-a-game-changer-or-a-computational-challenge-2fb9320ef800
5. Context Engineering: Can you trust long context? – Vectara, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.vectara.com/blog/context-engineering-can-you-trust-long-context
6. The Best GPUs for Local LLM Inference in 2025, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://localllm.in/blog/best-gpus-llm-inference-2025
7. Speed Always Wins: A Survey on Efficient Architectures for Large Language Models – arXiv, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2508.09834v1
8. Medium-Large LLM Inference from an SSD! : r/LocalLLM – Reddit, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLM/comments/1naejkr/mediumlarge_llm_inference_from_an_ssd/
9. Paged Attention and vLLM | Continuum Labs, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://training.continuumlabs.ai/inference/why-is-inference-important/paged-attention-and-vllm
10. How vLLM does it? – Rishiraj Acharya, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://rishirajacharya.com/how-vllm-does-it
11. Part 2 — Memory Is the Real Bottleneck: How Paged Attention Powers the vLLM Inference Engine | Data Science Dojo, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://datasciencedojo.com/blog/understanding-paged-attention/
12. Jenga: Effective Memory Management for Serving LLM with Heterogeneity – arXiv, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2503.18292v1
13. Jenga: Effective Memory Management for Serving LLM with Heterogeneity – ResearchGate, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/390142675_Jenga_Effective_Memory_Management_for_Serving_LLM_with_Heterogeneity
14. vAttention: Dynamic Memory Management for Serving LLMs without PagedAttention – ResearchGate, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388777583_vAttention_Dynamic_Memory_Management_for_Serving_LLMs_without_PagedAttention
15. An I/O Characterizing Study of Offloading LLM Models and KV Caches to NVMe SSD, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/an-io-characterizing-study-of-offloading-llm-models-and-kv-caches/
16. InstInfer: In-Storage Attention Offloading for Cost-Effective Long-Context LLM Inference, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2409.04992v1
17. 245 TB SSD also coming for those who need capacity more than cutting-edge speed : r/technews – Reddit, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/technews/comments/1mdhum4/microns_industryfirst_pci_60_ssd_promises/
18. PCIe 6.0 SSD with 30.25 GB/s speeds debuts at Computex, release date is still a long way off | Tom’s Hardware, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/ssds/pcie-6-0-ssd-with-30-25-gb-s-speeds-debuts-at-computex-release-date-is-still-a-long-way-off
19. NVIDIA GB200 NVL72 Delivers Trillion-Parameter LLM Training and Real-Time Inference, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/nvidia-gb200-nvl72-delivers-trillion-parameter-llm-training-and-real-time-inference/
20. NVIDIA Blackwell Platform Arrives to Power a New Era of Computing, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/nvidia-blackwell-platform-arrives-to-power-a-new-era-of-computing
21. Empowering AI: Samsung Showcases Next-Gen Memory Solutions at the 2024 OCP Global Summit, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://semiconductor.samsung.com/news-events/tech-blog/empowering-ai-samsung-showcases-next-gen-memory-solutions-at-the-2024-ocp-global-summit/
22. Samsung Targets 256 TB PCIe 6.0 SSD in 2026, 512 TB Capacity in 2027 | TechPowerUp, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.techpowerup.com/341451/samsung-targets-256-tb-pcie-6-0-ssd-in-2026-512-tb-capacity-in-2027
23. [ICML 2024] KIVI: A Tuning-Free Asymmetric 2bit Quantization for KV Cache – GitHub, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://github.com/jy-yuan/KIVI
24. KIVI: A Tuning-Free Asymmetric 2bit Quantization for KV Cache – GitHub, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mlresearch/v235/main/assets/liu24bz/liu24bz.pdf
25. [2402.02750] KIVI: A Tuning-Free Asymmetric 2bit Quantization for KV Cache – arXiv, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.02750
26. KIVI: A Tuning-Free Asymmetric 2bit Quantization for KV Cache – arXiv, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2402.02750v2
27. MiniKV: Pushing the Limits of 2-Bit KV Cache via Compression and System Co-Design for Efficient Long Context Inference – arXiv, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2411.18077v3
28. MiniKV: Pushing the Limits of 2-Bit KV Cache via Compression and System Co-Design for Efficient Long Context Inference – ACL Anthology, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://aclanthology.org/2025.findings-acl.952.pdf
29. MiniKV: 2-Bit KV Cache for LLMs | PDF | Computing – Scribd, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/814284617/2411-18077v2
30. GraphKV: Breaking the Static Selection Paradigm with Graph-Based KV Cache Eviction – ACL Anthology, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://aclanthology.org/2025.emnlp-main.1112.pdf
31. SnapKV : LLM Knows What You are Looking for Before Generation – arXiv, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2404.14469v1
32. Token Eviction Mechanism – Emergent Mind, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.emergentmind.com/topics/token-eviction-mechanism
33. InstInfer: In-Storage Attention Offloading for Cost-Effective Long-Context LLM Inference, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.alphaxiv.org/overview/2409.04992v1
34. [Literature Review] InstInfer: In-Storage Attention Offloading for Cost-Effective Long-Context LLM Inference – Moonlight, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.themoonlight.io/en/review/instinfer-in-storage-attention-offloading-for-cost-effective-long-context-llm-inference
35. The Secret Sauce for AI Storage – ScaleFlux, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://scaleflux.com/storage/scaleflux-the-secret-sauce-for-ai-storage/
36. Pushing Storage Power Efficiency to the Limit: ScaleFlux CSD5000 Live Demo, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://scaleflux.com/blog/pushing-storage-power-efficiency-to-the-limit-scaleflux-csd5000-live-demo/
37. Get better utilization, efficiency and TCO with ScaleFlux CSD5000, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://scaleflux.com/products/csd-5000/
38. Scaling to Millions of Tokens with Efficient Long-Context LLM …, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/scaling-to-millions-of-tokens-with-efficient-long-context-llm-training/
39. Ring Attention Explained | Coconut Mode, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://coconut-mode.com/posts/ring-attention/
40. Ring Attention with Blockwise Transformers for Near-Infinite Context – arXiv, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2310.01889v1
41. Handling long context: Understanding concept of Blockwise Parallel Transformers and Ring Attention | by Aadishagrawal | Medium, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://medium.com/@aadishagrawal/handling-long-context-understanding-concept-of-blockwise-parallel-transformers-and-ring-attention-cacfaf2363e1
42. Scaling LLM Inference: Innovations in Tensor Parallelism, Context Parallelism, and Expert Parallelism – Engineering at Meta, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://engineering.fb.com/2025/10/17/ai-research/scaling-llm-inference-innovations-tensor-parallelism-context-parallelism-expert-parallelism/
43. Context Parallelism Overview — AWS Neuron Documentation, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://awsdocs-neuron.readthedocs-hosted.com/en/latest/libraries/neuronx-distributed/context_parallelism_overview.html
44. TokenRing: An Efficient Parallelism Framework for Infinite-Context LLMs via Bidirectional Communication – arXiv, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2412.20501v1
45. Scalable Inference with RDMA and Tiered KV Caching | by Nadeem Khan(NK) – Medium, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://medium.com/learnwithnk/scalable-inference-with-rdma-and-tiered-kv-caching-9d7e494a863b
46. FireAttention — Serving Open Source Models 4x faster than vLLM by quantizing with ~no tradeoffs – Fireworks AI, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://fireworks.ai/blog/fire-attention-serving-open-source-models-4x-faster-than-vllm-by-quantizing-with-no-tradeoffs
47. FireAttention V2: 12x faster to make Long Contexts practical for …, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://fireworks.ai/blog/fireattention-v2-long-context-inference
48. Deep dive into NVIDIA Blackwell Benchmarks — where does the 4x training and 30x inference performance gain, and 25x reduction in energy usage come from? – adrian cockcroft, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://adrianco.medium.com/deep-dive-into-nvidia-blackwell-benchmarks-where-does-the-4x-training-and-30x-inference-0209f1971e71
49. Micron Unveils Portfolio of Industry-First SSDs to Power the AI Revolution, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://investors.micron.com/news-releases/news-release-details/micron-unveils-portfolio-industry-first-ssds-power-ai-revolution
50. Micron unveils PCIe Gen6 SSD to power AI data center workloads – Network World, accessed on December 13, 2025, https://www.networkworld.com/article/4031286/micron-unveils-pcie-gen6-ssd-to-power-ai-data-center-workloads.html